Rispondi alla discussione

JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.

Testo: <blockquote data-quote="Marietto64" data-source="post: 5686732" data-attributes="member: 29953">Letture polarizzate...<a href="http://www.fftri.com/files/pdf/Seiler%20IJSPP%202010.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.fftri.com/files/pdf/Seiler IJSPP 2010.pdf</a>Interessante questo studio citato nel documento  perchè molto lungo e perchè prende in considerazione la individualizzazioneGaskill et al reported the results of a 2 y project involving 14 cross-country skiers. During the first year, athletes trained similarly, averaging 660 training hours with 16% HIT (nominal distribution of sessions). Physiological test results and race performances during the first year were used to identify seven athletes who responded well to the training and seven who showed poor VO2 max and lactate threshold progression, and race results. In the second year, the positive responders continued using their established training program whereas the nonresponders performed a markedly intensified training program with a slight reduction in training hours. They observed that the nonresponders from year 1 showed a positive response to the intensified program in year 2 (VO2 max, lactate threshold, raceresult points). The positive responders from year 1 showed a similar development in year 2 as year 1.Allego conclusioni del documento  con qualche mio grassetto:The studies outlined above combine to suggest that over the long term, (1) successful endurance athletes achieve excellent results when accumulating a high training volume by emphasizing frequent exposure to 60 to 180 min bouts performed at approximately 60 to 75% of VO2 max (ie, LIT) in combination with a modest proportion of training performed at intensities between 85 and 100% of VO2 max (about 20% of training sessions), and (2) when HIT is heavily emphasized by adding interval workouts and decreasing the volume of LIT, the effects are equivocal at best. While these conclusions are based on a growing body of published studies, they are unrevealing and unsatisfying from a mechanistic viewpoint.<img src="/forum/styles/uix/xenforo/smilies_vb/beer.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="o-o" title="Beer    o-o" data-shortname="o-o" /></blockquote>

Verifica Anti SPAM

Alto Basso

Cerca

Cerca

Rispondi alla discussione