Cerca
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Menu
Home
Forum
Nuovi Messaggi
Cerca...
Iscritti
Visitatori online
Novità
Nuovi Messaggi
Nuovi media
Nuovi commenti media
Ultime Attività
Nuove inserzioni nel mercatino
Nuovi commenti nel mercatino
Mercatino
Nuove inserzioni
Nuovi commenti
Latest reviews
Cerca nel mercatino
Feedback
Guarda le statistiche
Training Camp
Pianificazione
MTB
Media
Nuovi media
Nuovi commenti
Cerca media
EBIKE
Accedi
Registrati
Cerca
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Nuovi Messaggi
Cerca...
Iscritti
Visitatori online
Menu
Install the app
Installa
Rispondi alla discussione
Quanto possiamo tenere il nostro casco essendo sicuri che protegga la nostra testa?
Iscriviti al canale se non l'hai ancora fatto
(clicca qui)
.
JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.
Stai usando un browser molto obsoleto. Puoi incorrere in problemi di visualizzazione di questo e altri siti oltre che in problemi di sicurezza. .
Dovresti aggiornarlo oppure
usarne uno alternativo, moderno e sicuro
.
Home
Forum
Tecnica
Pista
lenticolare da pista
Testo
<blockquote data-quote="Sikhandar" data-source="post: 2413566" data-attributes="member: 3778"><p>Ciao ti riporto una simpatica review di alcune lenticolari; è tratta da un sito americano pertanto non c'è il pool-market tipico italiano (quindi no campagnolo, no gipiemme...). Però è vero che Miche = Zipp 900; e che la Falcon Accel 2 costa 899$ =)</p><p></p><p>Mi pare scritto molto bene e pieno di senso.</p><p></p><p>Mi sono imbattuto in questo post perchè guardavo un po' le lenticolari leggere, e "si narra" che la Falcon Accel 2 ha un peso "stupidly lower than the others" attestandosi a 700 grammi (!!!)</p><p></p><p>"I've had Arayas, Accel's, Zipp's, Corimas, and Cometes. Of them all, the Comete is by far the stablest -- I can horse it through raunchy transitions or hard drops down to the pole and never feel it's giving way. Yes it is heavier, but it also has the best hubs of any of them, easy and complete parts availability, etc. Tire bed is aluminum so you don't have any gluing problems, and it's wide enough that you can mount a tire like a 22 mm Dugast without worrying about whether it's adequately supported. It's a disc that completely rewards the rider who works it harder and is stronger. There's a reason it's the ubiquitous disc at World Cup and higher events. FYI, there's a 5-spoke rear Mavic coming out (looks just like an Io front but for the rear); I got a chance to ride one and it's not as stiff, doesn't steer as well (see below), but if your track is outdoors and gusty, a nice alternative. It's also about $4K. </p><p></p><p>Arayas are very nice, not as stiff, but also lighter. For a light rider, you might prefer them. Very costly. A lot of the cost of these discs ends up in the hubs (witness the problems Zipp has had getting a reliable hub for their track wheels). Narrower tire bed, so you probably don't want to use wider than a 21 mm Tufo on them. They have a very supple feel, which rewards a nice tire (like a Dugast silk latex) on a nice wooden track. Beautifully finished. </p><p></p><p>The Accel's are lower quality construction (all comments about Accel's basically apply to Corimas as well), have mediocre axles, rough spots that whistle at speed, and tend not to be as precisely round and true as the Comete or the Araya. </p><p></p><p>Zipps are Zipps. Good deals for the money, relatively stiff at a lower weight, and you don't cry too hard if you crash one (not like when you crash an Io). They don't take the abuse a Mavic does -- they pick up dings, dents, etc. faster. Buy last year's model and get a big savings because they're always changing the wheels slightly but not enough to affect your time -- just get an '04 or later so you get the better hubs. </p><p></p><p>As for which is faster, it all depends on how fast you're going and where any wind is coming from. Dead on at 30+ mph, a flat disc will have a slight but meaningful advantage. For a pursuit rider, it's likely the better choice. But if you're riding up and down the bankings, riding an outdoor track with wind, etc., the lenticular will probably give you an equal or slightly better ride (again depending on speed and wind angle). </p><p></p><p>Perhaps the most important thing to consider for certain track events are the absolute strength of the wheel and its steerability. Lenticular discs use basic centrifugal equilibrium to make the wheel steer much more easily and naturally; in comparison, a flat disc tries to take a straight line and is resistant to changes of direction (think about spinning a top and then trying to tilt it -- it resists the action; so does a disc, but a flat disc does it to a significantly greater extent). So if you want to maneuver a lot, especially at speed (read madison, sprint and keirin) a flat disc destabilizes your ride as you change direction. Aero effects become secondary to your feeling of instability -- you'll slow down or not be comfortable pushing in squirrelly situations. Throw in any decrease in disc strength, and you can't use the strength you've trained to develop. You never win that way. This isn't a problem again, for pursuit, for a lot of omnium racing, and for most kilo or 500m riders, but it's a very big issue if you're twisting and turning all over in the middle of a madison. Sprints and keirin are similarly an issue."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sikhandar, post: 2413566, member: 3778"] Ciao ti riporto una simpatica review di alcune lenticolari; è tratta da un sito americano pertanto non c'è il pool-market tipico italiano (quindi no campagnolo, no gipiemme...). Però è vero che Miche = Zipp 900; e che la Falcon Accel 2 costa 899$ =) Mi pare scritto molto bene e pieno di senso. Mi sono imbattuto in questo post perchè guardavo un po' le lenticolari leggere, e "si narra" che la Falcon Accel 2 ha un peso "stupidly lower than the others" attestandosi a 700 grammi (!!!) "I've had Arayas, Accel's, Zipp's, Corimas, and Cometes. Of them all, the Comete is by far the stablest -- I can horse it through raunchy transitions or hard drops down to the pole and never feel it's giving way. Yes it is heavier, but it also has the best hubs of any of them, easy and complete parts availability, etc. Tire bed is aluminum so you don't have any gluing problems, and it's wide enough that you can mount a tire like a 22 mm Dugast without worrying about whether it's adequately supported. It's a disc that completely rewards the rider who works it harder and is stronger. There's a reason it's the ubiquitous disc at World Cup and higher events. FYI, there's a 5-spoke rear Mavic coming out (looks just like an Io front but for the rear); I got a chance to ride one and it's not as stiff, doesn't steer as well (see below), but if your track is outdoors and gusty, a nice alternative. It's also about $4K. Arayas are very nice, not as stiff, but also lighter. For a light rider, you might prefer them. Very costly. A lot of the cost of these discs ends up in the hubs (witness the problems Zipp has had getting a reliable hub for their track wheels). Narrower tire bed, so you probably don't want to use wider than a 21 mm Tufo on them. They have a very supple feel, which rewards a nice tire (like a Dugast silk latex) on a nice wooden track. Beautifully finished. The Accel's are lower quality construction (all comments about Accel's basically apply to Corimas as well), have mediocre axles, rough spots that whistle at speed, and tend not to be as precisely round and true as the Comete or the Araya. Zipps are Zipps. Good deals for the money, relatively stiff at a lower weight, and you don't cry too hard if you crash one (not like when you crash an Io). They don't take the abuse a Mavic does -- they pick up dings, dents, etc. faster. Buy last year's model and get a big savings because they're always changing the wheels slightly but not enough to affect your time -- just get an '04 or later so you get the better hubs. As for which is faster, it all depends on how fast you're going and where any wind is coming from. Dead on at 30+ mph, a flat disc will have a slight but meaningful advantage. For a pursuit rider, it's likely the better choice. But if you're riding up and down the bankings, riding an outdoor track with wind, etc., the lenticular will probably give you an equal or slightly better ride (again depending on speed and wind angle). Perhaps the most important thing to consider for certain track events are the absolute strength of the wheel and its steerability. Lenticular discs use basic centrifugal equilibrium to make the wheel steer much more easily and naturally; in comparison, a flat disc tries to take a straight line and is resistant to changes of direction (think about spinning a top and then trying to tilt it -- it resists the action; so does a disc, but a flat disc does it to a significantly greater extent). So if you want to maneuver a lot, especially at speed (read madison, sprint and keirin) a flat disc destabilizes your ride as you change direction. Aero effects become secondary to your feeling of instability -- you'll slow down or not be comfortable pushing in squirrelly situations. Throw in any decrease in disc strength, and you can't use the strength you've trained to develop. You never win that way. This isn't a problem again, for pursuit, for a lot of omnium racing, and for most kilo or 500m riders, but it's a very big issue if you're twisting and turning all over in the middle of a madison. Sprints and keirin are similarly an issue." [/QUOTE]
Riporta citazioni...
Verifica Anti SPAM
Invia risposta
Home
Forum
Tecnica
Pista
lenticolare da pista
Alto
Basso