Rispondi alla discussione

JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.

Testo: <blockquote data-quote="martin_galante" data-source="post: 7307950" data-attributes="member: 108600">Forse qualcuno lo avra' gia' scritto, ma e' uscita la review del nuovo PM shimano (FC-R9200-P) di dcrainmaker. Gia' l'URL la dice lunga[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2023/02/shimano-r9200p-power-meter-review-astonishingly-bad.html[/URL]Si parla comunque di 1600E di PM, per il quale Shimano aveva lasciato intendere di aver risolto i noti problemi della versione precedente. Invece si conferma la review di Miller, e per farla breveFor the second edition in a row, the Shimano power meter simply isn’t accurate. Not even close. And it’s been ‘not accurate’ for a long time. The previous model wasn’t accurate, and then Shimano made a big deal of implying this one would be accurate. Shimano stalled for many months to get review units out to any reputable reviewer, and I finally got one last summer. I’ve put a lot of rides in a lot of conditions on it, and ultimately, the answer is unequivocally clear: It’s simply bad.And mind you – that’s the same overall result that another industry-trusted power meter reviewer found, as well as numerous other media outlets. And now you can see why I skipped going through the motions of spending hours consolidating photos of installation, general usage, screenshots of the app, or anything else. With a power meter – if it’s not accurate, then nothing else matters. Period.[...]Complicating matters further is that many media outlets also have extremely heavy advertising spend from Shimano, which is one reason why you don’t quite see as many detailed accuracy-focused reviews of the Shimano power meters. But again, if a power meter is inaccurate, it serves no purpose as a product.</blockquote>

Verifica Anti SPAM

Alto Basso

Cerca

Cerca

Rispondi alla discussione